| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | State Bureau of Investigation |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Property Stolen and Recovered by County 2005 - 2006 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | See 'Agency Reporting Status and Population' and 'Reporting Participation by Month' to determine the agencies reporting by month and by year within the county. The following counties have either low popluation coverage or incomplete reporting for 1999: Alleghany, Hoke, and Mitchell, for 2000: Mitchell. The 'county' of 'Statewide' includes those offenses reported by the State Highway Patrol and Wildlife Enforcement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | County Name | Year | Value of Property Stolen | Value of Property Recovered | Percent Recovered | | Alamance | 2005 | $5,395,208 | $886,240 | 16.4 % | | Alamance | 2006 | $17,651,922 | $1,177,145 | 6.7 % | | Alexander | 2005 | $1,015,447 | $344,090 | 33.9 % | | Alexander | 2006 | $973,703 | $434,582 | 44.6 % | | Alleghany | 2005 | $29,681 | $5,111 | 17.2 % | | Alleghany | 2006 | $26,290 | $7,859 | 29.9 % | | Anson | 2005 | $1,265,010 | $580,841 | 45.9 % | | Anson | 2006 | $1,013,085 | $202,286 | 20.0 % | | Ashe | 2005 | $490,674 | $283,873 | 57.9 % | | Ashe | 2006 | $757,022 | $270,409 | 35.7 % | | Avery | 2005 | $403,834 | $78,895 | 19.5 % | | Avery | 2006 | $466,088 | $41,151 | 8.8 % | | Beaufort | 2005 | $1,086,810 | $296,337 | 27.3 % | | Beaufort | 2006 | $1,254,851 | $533,489 | 42.5 % | | Bertie | 2005 | $494,074 | $179,366 | 36.3 % | | Bertie | 2006 | $510,601 | $180,104 | 35.3 % | | Bladen | 2005 | $982,905 | $223,803 | 22.8 % | | Bladen | 2006 | $2,083,654 | $439,209 | 21.1 % | | Brunswick | 2005 | $6,134,647 | $2,173,351 | 35.4 % | | Brunswick | 2006 | $6,882,999 | $2,001,817 | 29.1 % | | Buncombe | 2005 | $13,146,718 | $3,429,730 | 26.1 % | | Buncombe | 2006 | $12,867,362 | $3,861,220 | 30.0 % | | Burke | 2005 | $2,547,141 | $250,951 | 9.9 % | | Burke | 2006 | $2,065,190 | $137,726 | 6.7 % | | Cabarrus | 2005 | $7,033,726 | $1,918,459 | 27.3 % | | Cabarrus | 2006 | $9,349,130 | $3,167,097 | 33.9 % | | Caldwell | 2005 | $3,026,041 | $1,078,092 | 35.6 % | | Caldwell | 2006 | $2,609,359 | $585,842 | 22.5 % | | Camden | 2005 | $72,311 | $1,557 | 2.2 % | | Camden | 2006 | $233,900 | $44,591 | 19.1 % | | Carteret | 2005 | $1,611,271 | $610,646 | 37.9 % | | Carteret | 2006 | $2,315,991 | $521,203 | 22.5 % | | Caswell | 2005 | $503,660 | $164,238 | 32.6 % | | Caswell | 2006 | $504,017 | $129,923 | 25.8 % | | Catawba | 2005 | $11,105,660 | $5,068,731 | 45.6 % | | Catawba | 2006 | $8,756,264 | $2,872,687 | 32.8 % | | Chatham | 2005 | $2,004,617 | $559,924 | 27.9 % | | Chatham | 2006 | $1,902,059 | $343,099 | 18.0 % | | Cherokee | 2005 | $1,003,344 | $176,937 | 17.6 % | | Cherokee | 2006 | $113,703 | $36,462 | 32.1 % | | Chowan | 2005 | $460,968 | $210,725 | 45.7 % | | Chowan | 2006 | $485,875 | $141,410 | 29.1 % | | Clay | 2005 | $359,633 | $79,145 | 22.0 % | | Clay | 2006 | $356,324 | $180,615 | 50.7 % | | Cleveland | 2005 | $4,043,605 | $600,450 | 14.8 % | | Cleveland | 2006 | $4,608,561 | $835,788 | 18.1 % | | Columbus | 2005 | $3,412,947 | $974,056 | 28.5 % | | Columbus | 2006 | $3,728,884 | $762,345 | 20.4 % | | Craven | 2005 | $2,447,939 | $603,157 | 24.6 % | | Craven | 2006 | $2,813,315 | $752,580 | 26.8 % | | Cumberland | 2005 | $26,697,108 | $8,003,904 | 30.0 % | | Cumberland | 2006 | $29,678,732 | $10,621,108 | 35.8 % | | Currituck | 2005 | $463,602 | $79,694 | 17.2 % | | Currituck | 2006 | $432,205 | $89,172 | 20.6 % | | Dare | 2005 | $1,348,317 | $367,659 | 27.3 % | | Dare | 2006 | $1,371,573 | $184,068 | 13.4 % | | Davidson | 2005 | $6,034,059 | $1,637,966 | 27.1 % | | Davidson | 2006 | $5,830,552 | $974,437 | 16.7 % | | Davie | 2005 | $783,604 | $196,528 | 25.1 % | | Davie | 2006 | $1,072,900 | $307,310 | 28.6 % | | Duplin | 2005 | $2,248,632 | $1,319,916 | 58.7 % | | Duplin | 2006 | $1,649,727 | $507,516 | 30.8 % | | Durham | 2005 | $17,918,739 | $5,995,393 | 33.5 % | | Durham | 2006 | $19,016,865 | $7,485,386 | 39.4 % | | Edgecombe | 2005 | $5,637,548 | $1,844,769 | 32.7 % | | Edgecombe | 2006 | $8,368,662 | $2,638,592 | 31.5 % | | Forsyth | 2005 | $18,612,865 | $6,708,438 | 36.0 % | | Forsyth | 2006 | $18,293,510 | $6,126,135 | 33.5 % | | Franklin | 2005 | $1,307,261 | $178,467 | 13.7 % | | Franklin | 2006 | $1,648,706 | $183,841 | 11.2 % | | Gaston | 2005 | $13,146,355 | $4,685,289 | 35.6 % | | Gaston | 2006 | $23,516,286 | $2,960,522 | 12.6 % | | Gates | 2005 | $694,224 | $335,050 | 48.3 % | | Gates | 2006 | $47,693 | $21,400 | 44.9 % | | Graham | 2006 | $356,254 | $64,625 | 18.1 % | | Granville | 2005 | $2,638,043 | $1,201,583 | 45.5 % | | Granville | 2006 | $2,229,653 | $697,200 | 31.3 % | | Greene | 2005 | $556,752 | $181,735 | 32.6 % | | Greene | 2006 | $528,799 | $51,827 | 9.8 % | | Guilford | 2005 | $30,944,046 | $10,583,544 | 34.2 % | | Guilford | 2006 | $31,436,293 | $9,849,387 | 31.3 % | | Halifax | 2005 | $3,053,902 | $1,083,226 | 35.5 % | | Halifax | 2006 | $2,814,097 | $619,080 | 22.0 % | | Harnett | 2005 | $5,174,635 | $1,733,501 | 33.5 % | | Harnett | 2006 | $5,175,418 | $1,943,073 | 37.5 % | | Haywood | 2005 | $2,786,823 | $654,024 | 23.5 % | | Haywood | 2006 | $2,461,619 | $530,928 | 21.6 % | | Henderson | 2005 | $3,642,012 | $1,188,152 | 32.6 % | | Henderson | 2006 | $3,818,038 | $1,375,625 | 36.0 % | | Hertford | 2005 | $864,419 | $223,043 | 25.8 % | | Hertford | 2006 | $627,040 | $168,177 | 26.8 % | | Hoke | 2005 | $3,029,979 | $807,073 | 26.6 % | | Hoke | 2006 | $2,448,846 | $260,795 | 10.6 % | | Hyde | 2005 | $37,805 | $0 | 0.0 % | | Iredell | 2005 | $6,915,862 | $2,664,803 | 38.5 % | | Iredell | 2006 | $8,493,092 | $2,252,192 | 26.5 % | | Jackson | 2005 | $1,917,916 | $137,671 | 7.2 % | | Jackson | 2006 | $1,491,303 | $210,153 | 14.1 % | | Johnston | 2005 | $6,402,184 | $1,203,315 | 18.8 % | | Johnston | 2006 | $7,147,418 | $1,491,555 | 20.9 % | | Jones | 2005 | $235,596 | $31,474 | 13.4 % | | Jones | 2006 | $369,178 | $26,106 | 7.1 % | | Lee | 2005 | $2,852,838 | $938,371 | 32.9 % | | Lee | 2006 | $2,964,109 | $1,372,220 | 46.3 % | | Lenoir | 2005 | $2,724,640 | $666,627 | 24.5 % | | Lenoir | 2006 | $2,517,281 | $750,751 | 29.8 % | | Lincoln | 2005 | $480,130 | $112,621 | 23.5 % | | Lincoln | 2006 | $3,298,090 | $241,224 | 7.3 % | | Macon | 2005 | $762,021 | $218,589 | 28.7 % | | Macon | 2006 | $860,137 | $301,491 | 35.1 % | | Madison | 2005 | $508,560 | $153,068 | 30.1 % | | Madison | 2006 | $407,609 | $18,415 | 4.5 % | | Martin | 2005 | $1,000,720 | $173,007 | 17.3 % | | Martin | 2006 | $662,009 | $206,149 | 31.1 % | | McDowell | 2005 | $1,503,609 | $390,030 | 25.9 % | | McDowell | 2006 | $1,264,937 | $503,188 | 39.8 % | | Mecklenburg | 2005 | $102,972,320 | $37,162,331 | 36.1 % | | Mecklenburg | 2006 | $117,072,267 | $38,119,401 | 32.6 % | | Mitchell | 2005 | $17,099 | $0 | 0.0 % | | Mitchell | 2006 | $62,588 | $0 | 0.0 % | | Montgomery | 2005 | $793,533 | $133,627 | 16.8 % | | Montgomery | 2006 | $1,533,044 | $321,948 | 21.0 % | | Moore | 2005 | $2,842,261 | $1,025,210 | 36.1 % | | Moore | 2006 | $2,631,857 | $850,430 | 32.3 % | | Nash | 2005 | $1,568,615 | $344,275 | 21.9 % | | Nash | 2006 | $1,571,441 | $284,481 | 18.1 % | | New Hanover | 2005 | $15,638,947 | $6,617,670 | 42.3 % | | New Hanover | 2006 | $15,713,844 | $5,747,296 | 36.6 % | | Northampton | 2005 | $729,828 | $93,955 | 12.9 % | | Northampton | 2006 | $456,243 | $27,700 | 6.1 % | | Onslow | 2005 | $3,870,031 | $950,038 | 24.5 % | | Onslow | 2006 | $7,245,006 | $1,701,572 | 23.5 % | | Orange | 2005 | $4,412,830 | $881,996 | 20.0 % | | Orange | 2006 | $4,761,730 | $996,130 | 20.9 % | | Pamlico | 2005 | $55,462 | $85 | 0.2 % | | Pasquotank | 2005 | $2,247,728 | $789,704 | 35.1 % | | Pasquotank | 2006 | $1,661,931 | $487,244 | 29.3 % | | Pender | 2005 | $1,033,258 | $68,568 | 6.6 % | | Pender | 2006 | $1,480,797 | $176,948 | 11.9 % | | Perquimans | 2005 | $282,448 | $160,341 | 56.8 % | | Perquimans | 2006 | $325,544 | $73,141 | 22.5 % | | Person | 2005 | $1,516,484 | $217,461 | 14.3 % | | Person | 2006 | $1,376,112 | $260,851 | 19.0 % | | Pitt | 2005 | $6,183,921 | $1,839,829 | 29.8 % | | Pitt | 2006 | $6,175,856 | $2,052,767 | 33.2 % | | Polk | 2005 | $524,480 | $174,337 | 33.2 % | | Polk | 2006 | $414,712 | $76,974 | 18.6 % | | Randolph | 2005 | $6,408,387 | $1,859,464 | 29.0 % | | Randolph | 2006 | $6,544,839 | $2,525,031 | 38.6 % | | Richmond | 2005 | $2,037,485 | $254,866 | 12.5 % | | Richmond | 2006 | $2,564,851 | $389,245 | 15.2 % | | Robeson | 2005 | $9,537,606 | $1,993,787 | 20.9 % | | Robeson | 2006 | $9,710,516 | $1,808,752 | 18.6 % | | Rockingham | 2005 | $3,512,630 | $751,155 | 21.4 % | | Rockingham | 2006 | $4,786,198 | $1,727,813 | 36.1 % | | Rowan | 2005 | $6,691,122 | $943,701 | 14.1 % | | Rowan | 2006 | $6,032,937 | $1,771,920 | 29.4 % | | Rutherford | 2005 | $2,249,878 | $1,682,101 | 74.8 % | | Rutherford | 2006 | $2,253,146 | $834,742 | 37.0 % | | Sampson | 2005 | $2,952,856 | $708,672 | 24.0 % | | Sampson | 2006 | $2,713,075 | $712,520 | 26.3 % | | Scotland | 2005 | $1,783,940 | $678,609 | 38.0 % | | Scotland | 2006 | $1,546,703 | $591,088 | 38.2 % | | Stanly | 2005 | $1,184,224 | $383,480 | 32.4 % | | Stanly | 2006 | $1,680,681 | $422,229 | 25.1 % | | Stokes | 2005 | $1,530,896 | $397,359 | 26.0 % | | Stokes | 2006 | $1,178,364 | $439,153 | 37.3 % | | Surry | 2005 | $2,153,212 | $324,636 | 15.1 % | | Surry | 2006 | $3,033,433 | $477,541 | 15.7 % | | Swain | 2005 | $3,915,968 | $12,550 | 0.3 % | | Swain | 2006 | $743,439 | $221,333 | 29.8 % | | Transylvania | 2005 | $603,805 | $211,303 | 35.0 % | | Transylvania | 2006 | $850,070 | $125,048 | 14.7 % | | Tyrrell | 2005 | $71,564 | $28,527 | 39.9 % | | Tyrrell | 2006 | $27,849 | $1,500 | 5.4 % | | Union | 2005 | $7,489,160 | $1,065,865 | 14.2 % | | Union | 2006 | $9,317,746 | $1,746,077 | 18.7 % | | Vance | 2005 | $2,722,460 | $456,249 | 16.8 % | | Vance | 2006 | $3,106,103 | $618,915 | 19.9 % | | Wake | 2005 | $34,594,442 | $7,545,171 | 21.8 % | | Wake | 2006 | $44,771,000 | $10,653,469 | 23.8 % | | Warren | 2005 | $854,280 | $2,146 | 0.3 % | | Warren | 2006 | $563,562 | $31,415 | 5.6 % | | Washington | 2005 | $362,895 | $99,593 | 27.4 % | | Washington | 2006 | $121,133 | $31,837 | 26.3 % | | Watauga | 2005 | $1,225,768 | $397,550 | 32.4 % | | Watauga | 2006 | $1,142,047 | $298,981 | 26.2 % | | Wayne | 2005 | $4,691,076 | $1,675,749 | 35.7 % | | Wayne | 2006 | $4,966,014 | $1,632,209 | 32.9 % | | Wilkes | 2005 | $1,811,718 | $638,347 | 35.2 % | | Wilkes | 2006 | $1,952,197 | $707,279 | 36.2 % | | Wilson | 2005 | $2,800,885 | $640,122 | 22.9 % | | Wilson | 2006 | $3,500,149 | $599,386 | 17.1 % | | Yadkin | 2005 | $622,753 | $291,982 | 46.9 % | | Yadkin | 2006 | $753,430 | $379,046 | 50.3 % | | Yancey | 2005 | $84,615 | $24,959 | 29.5 % | | Yancey | 2006 | $127,659 | $70,455 | 55.2 % | | State Totals | 2003 | | | | | State Totals | 2004 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|